Materiality & Atmosphere
Theoretical Building Block
Materiality is a canonical concept within Regional Development in World Society (RWS). It refers to ecological, infrastructural, technological and resource-related conditions that shape the possibilities and constraints of regional development without determining societal outcomes directly.
Atmosphere, by contrast, is explored here as a possible analytical extension of materiality.
The concept may be useful for analysing material conditions that are diffuse, mobile, difficult to delimit and not easily attributable to a single territory, organization or infrastructure.
The theoretical question is therefore:
How can RWS analyse material conditions whose effects are real and regionally consequential, but whose spatial boundaries and causal attribution remain unstable or diffuse?
Working Definition
Materiality refers to the materially differentiated conditions under which world-societal processes become territorially relevant and regionally consequential. Atmosphere is explored as a possible analytical category for material conditions that are mobile, diffuse, relational and difficult to delimit territorially.
Possible examples include:
- air pollution,
- heat,
- humidity,
- smoke,
- climatic circulation,
- changing precipitation patterns,
- dust,
- airborne contamination,
- and other materially consequential processes that exceed clear territorial boundaries.
Atmosphere is not treated here as an established RWS concept.
It remains part of the open theoretical agenda.
Relation to the Canonical Concept of Materiality
The canonical RWS concept of Materiality addresses the role of:
- ecological systems,
- infrastructures,
- technologies,
- resource deposits,
- built environments,
- and other physical conditions
in regional development.
Its central proposition is that material conditions can enable, constrain, intensify and resist societal processes without determining them directly.
Atmosphere does not replace this concept.
It asks whether a more specific theoretical vocabulary is needed for forms of materiality whose spatial characteristics differ from relatively stable objects such as roads, ports, mines, settlements or fixed infrastructures.
Theoretical Problem
Many forms of regional analysis implicitly rely on spatially identifiable material conditions.
A mine has a location.
A port occupies a site.
A road follows a route.
A reservoir can be mapped.
A protected area can be territorially delimited.
Atmospheric processes are different.
Air pollution can move beyond the site where it is produced.
Heat can extend across administrative boundaries.
Smoke can travel hundreds or thousands of kilometres.
Humidity and rainfall depend on larger ecological and atmospheric circulations.
Climate change alters local conditions through processes whose causes cannot be territorially localized.
The analytical problem is therefore not simply where a material condition is located.
It is also:
How do mobile and diffuse material processes become regionally relevant despite exceeding regional boundaries?
Diffuse Materiality
Atmospheric conditions can be understood as forms of diffuse materiality.
Their effects are material.
They can affect:
- health,
- agriculture,
- infrastructure,
- ecosystems,
- mobility,
- labour,
- settlement,
- and economic activity.
Yet the processes producing these effects may not correspond to the territories where consequences appear.
This creates a challenge for regional attribution.
A region may experience severe smoke pollution without being the principal source of fire.
A coastal municipality may experience sea-level rise produced by global climatic processes.
Urban heat may reflect both local land use and wider climatic conditions.
Diffuse materiality therefore complicates simple relations between territory, cause and consequence.
Mobility
Atmospheric conditions are often mobile.
Air masses move.
Pollutants circulate.
Smoke travels.
Heat is redistributed.
Moisture moves through atmospheric systems.
This mobility means that material conditions can connect distant territories without requiring direct organizational or infrastructural connections.
Atmospheric mobility therefore introduces a form of material interdependence that differs from conventional network infrastructure.
Territorial Boundaries
Atmospheric processes do not respect administrative boundaries.
Municipal, regional and national borders may remain highly relevant for political and organizational decision-making, but they do not delimit the movement of air, heat or climatic processes.
This creates a mismatch between:
material circulation
and
territorial governance
RWS can use this mismatch to examine how territorially organized decision structures respond to materially transboundary processes.
Observation and Measurement
Atmospheric processes frequently become societally relevant through observation and measurement.
Temperature records make heat trends visible.
Air-quality monitoring identifies pollution.
Satellite imagery detects smoke.
Climate models project future rainfall or sea-level change.
Meteorological networks measure atmospheric circulation.
Such conditions may exist independently of measurement, but measurement transforms them into forms that organizations can process.
Atmospheric materiality therefore has a particularly close relationship to knowledge infrastructures.
Knowledge Infrastructure
Atmospheric conditions are difficult to observe without specialized knowledge systems.
Relevant infrastructures may include:
- meteorological stations,
- satellite systems,
- climate models,
- air-quality monitoring,
- hydrological monitoring,
- remote sensing,
- environmental databases,
- and forecasting systems.
These infrastructures connect material processes to organizational decision-making.
They can make diffuse conditions territorially legible.
Attribution
Atmospheric processes create attribution problems.
Organizations may be able to observe an effect without easily identifying responsibility for its cause.
Who is responsible for:
- regional air pollution,
- heat exposure,
- smoke from distant fires,
- climate-related flooding,
- or changes in precipitation?
Such questions may involve several scales and organizations.
Attribution therefore becomes an important analytical problem.
It connects materiality to law, politics, science and organizational responsibility.
Atmosphere and Functional Differentiation
Atmospheric conditions may become relevant to different societal domains in different ways.
Science may observe changing temperature patterns.
Politics may observe a climate-policy problem.
Law may process questions of responsibility.
Health organizations may observe epidemiological consequences.
Companies may observe operational risk.
Financial organizations may observe climate exposure.
The same atmospheric condition can therefore generate heterogeneous forms of societal relevance.
Atmosphere and Selective Territorialization
Atmospheric conditions can influence selective territorialization.
A territory may become relevant to climate governance because it is classified as highly vulnerable.
A city may become a priority for heat-adaptation programmes.
An agricultural region may attract climate-risk financing because changing rainfall patterns threaten production.
Atmospheric processes therefore can contribute to territorial relevance even though they are not territorially bounded themselves.
Atmosphere and Regionalization
Once atmospheric conditions become territorially relevant, they interact with historically accumulated regional structures.
Heat exposure may be intensified by existing urban form.
Flood risk may depend on settlement patterns and drainage infrastructure.
Smoke exposure may affect regions differently depending on health systems and economic activities.
Climate vulnerability may depend on existing institutional capacity.
Atmospheric conditions therefore become regionalized through their interaction with differentiated regional structures.
Atmosphere and Infrastructure
Infrastructure can mediate atmospheric conditions.
Examples include:
- cooling systems,
- drainage infrastructure,
- ventilation,
- coastal protection,
- water-management systems,
- air-quality monitoring,
- green infrastructure,
- and climate-adaptation systems.
Infrastructure can reduce, redirect or sometimes intensify atmospheric effects.
At the same time, infrastructure itself may become vulnerable to atmospheric processes.
Heat can affect transport systems.
Flooding can damage roads.
Storms can disrupt energy networks.
Atmosphere and infrastructure therefore interact reciprocally.
Climate Infrastructure
The concept of climate infrastructure provides one possible empirical bridge between materiality and atmosphere.
Within current RWS-related research, climate infrastructure refers to material, ecological, technological and institutional systems that stabilize, mediate or regulate climate-related processes.
Examples may include:
- mangrove ecosystems,
- drainage systems,
- monitoring networks,
- coastal protection,
- water infrastructure,
- adaptation systems,
- and climate-planning arrangements.
Climate infrastructure is not itself a foundational RWS concept.
It is an applied or middle-range concept through which the interaction of materiality, atmosphere, infrastructure and governance can be investigated.
Atmosphere and Organizations
Organizations respond to atmospheric conditions through different forms of observation and decision-making.
Municipalities may develop heat-action plans.
Environmental agencies may monitor pollution.
Health authorities may respond to smoke exposure.
Research organizations may model climatic change.
Companies may adapt operations to environmental risks.
Funding organizations may define climate vulnerability criteria.
Organizations therefore translate diffuse material conditions into differentiated decision contexts.
Atmospheric Governance
Atmospheric processes pose particular governance challenges because causes, effects and decision authority may operate at different scales.
Local governments may experience consequences without controlling their causes.
National governments may regulate emissions.
International agreements may establish climate obligations.
Scientific organizations may define measurement standards.
Financial institutions may establish climate-risk criteria.
Atmospheric governance therefore involves complex interorganizational and trans-scalar relationships.
Atmosphere and Asymmetry
Atmospheric effects are unevenly distributed.
Some populations and regions experience greater:
- heat exposure,
- pollution,
- climate vulnerability,
- flooding,
- drought,
- or storm risk.
Their capacities to respond are also unequal.
Regions with stronger infrastructure, health systems, planning capacity and financial resources may be better able to adapt.
Atmospheric materiality therefore interacts with existing regional asymmetries.
Atmosphere and Time
Atmospheric processes also introduce distinctive temporalities.
Some events are rapid:
- storms,
- smoke episodes,
- heat waves.
Others unfold gradually:
- sea-level rise,
- changing rainfall patterns,
- long-term warming.
Decision-making must therefore process both immediate events and long-term expectations.
Atmosphere links present observation with future-oriented planning particularly strongly.
Material Persistence and Atmospheric Mobility
Materiality and atmosphere differ partly in temporal and spatial behaviour.
Some material structures are persistent and relatively fixed:
- roads,
- buildings,
- mines,
- ports.
Atmospheric conditions may be:
- mobile,
- transient,
- recurrent,
- cyclical,
- or gradually changing.
This contrast may be analytically useful.
It suggests that regional materiality includes both:
persistent material structures
and
mobile or diffuse material processes
Atmosphere may provide a vocabulary for the latter.
Atmosphere and Regional Self-Description
Atmospheric conditions can also influence regional self-description.
A territory may be described as:
- climate-vulnerable,
- drought-prone,
- flood-exposed,
- heat-stressed,
- coastal-risk region,
- or climate-resilient.
Such descriptions can influence policy, funding and investment.
They can therefore participate in the construction of regional relevance.
Example: Amazonian Smoke
Smoke from forest fires provides a clear example of atmospheric materiality.
The source of smoke may be located far from the populations affected.
Atmospheric circulation transports particulate matter across municipal, regional and sometimes national boundaries.
Health systems experience consequences.
Scientific organizations monitor air quality.
Governments issue warnings.
Communities experience direct material effects.
The regional consequence is therefore real even when territorial attribution is complex.
Example: Coastal Climate Change
Coastal climate change provides another example.
Sea-level rise, temperature change, storm intensity and changing precipitation emerge from global climatic processes.
Their consequences become regionally differentiated through:
- coastal morphology,
- ecosystems,
- settlement patterns,
- infrastructure,
- economic activities,
- and institutional capacity.
Atmospheric and climatic processes therefore become regionalized through their interaction with existing material and societal structures.
Why Atmosphere May Matter for RWS
The concept of atmosphere may help RWS address a specific theoretical limitation.
The canonical concept of materiality captures the significance of physical conditions well.
However, some material processes are difficult to conceptualize as territorially localized conditions.
Atmosphere draws attention to:
- mobility,
- diffusion,
- transboundary effects,
- uncertain attribution,
- changing spatial extent,
- and relations between material circulation and territorial governance.
These characteristics may require a more differentiated theoretical treatment.
Why Atmosphere Is Not Yet Canonical
There are also reasons for caution.
Materiality may already be broad enough to analyse atmospheric processes.
Adding a new concept risks unnecessary conceptual proliferation.
“Atmosphere” also has established meanings in other theoretical traditions, including phenomenology, geography, architecture and affect theory.
RWS would therefore need to clarify precisely what analytical problem the concept solves that cannot already be addressed through materiality.
For this reason, atmosphere remains an exploratory concept.
Its usefulness must be demonstrated through theoretical comparison and empirical research.
Open Theoretical Questions
The concept raises questions such as:
- Does atmosphere identify a distinctive form of materiality?
- Is mobility sufficient to justify a separate analytical category?
- How should atmospheric processes be distinguished from ecological systems?
- How can territorially organized governance respond to materially transboundary processes?
- How are diffuse material conditions made observable?
- How is responsibility attributed when causes and consequences are spatially separated?
- How do atmospheric processes interact with infrastructures?
- How do atmospheric conditions become regionally differentiated?
- Can atmospheric processes produce distinctive forms of selective territorialization?
- How do atmospheric temporalities differ from those of persistent infrastructure?
- Does the concept improve empirical explanation, or does materiality already provide sufficient analytical capacity?
Relation to RWS
Materiality is a canonical concept within Regional Development in World Society.
Within RWS, regions are understood as:
Regions emerge as historically contingent configurations in which heterogeneous world-societal processes become selectively connected, organizationally stabilized, materially conditioned and institutionally condensed.
Materiality specifies the materially differentiated conditions under which these processes become territorially and regionally consequential.
Atmosphere is explored as a possible extension of this concept for analysing mobile, diffuse and transboundary material processes.
It does not currently alter the canonical RWS architecture.
Any future incorporation of atmosphere into that architecture would require theoretical clarification, empirical validation and a formal revision of the RWS conceptual framework.
Theoretical References
The concept of materiality within RWS draws on systems-theoretical questions concerning the environment of society while also engaging with broader approaches to materiality, infrastructure and socio-ecological processes.
The concept of atmosphere requires a separate theoretical reconstruction before it could become part of the canonical RWS architecture.
Relevant traditions may include work in:
- social systems theory,
- human geography,
- environmental sociology,
- infrastructure studies,
- phenomenology,
- atmospheric studies,
- and climate research.
A dedicated literature reconstruction should therefore precede any stronger theoretical adoption of the concept.
Related Concepts
Society–Nature & Material Approaches→
Explore
Regional Development in World Society →
Exploratory theoretical note — part of the open theoretical development of Regional Development in World Society (RWS).